Trumpeter’s 1/32 Tropical Fritz – almost but not quite.

As I’ve often mentioned in these very pages, I tend to build kits based on books I have read or currently reading.  At this point in my life, the subject has to interest me intensely to keep my attention across months long builds.  To that end, Pierre Clostermann’s “The Big Show” inspired a love for the Tempest Mk V, and rekindled an interest in the Spitfire Mk IX (a long over-due project now on the bench).  Robin Old’s autobiography “Fighter Pilot” bloated my stash with a 1/32 P-38, P-51, Shooting Star, Meteor and F-4C Phantom II.  Pertinent to this discussion is Dan Hampton’s seminal history of air combat “Lords of the Sky“. Hampton introduced me to one of the most interesting characters in the history of air combat, rivaling the original most interesting man in the world Robin Olds.

Hans-Joachim Marseille was a Luftwaffe pilot in the early stanzas of World War 2 and his famous “Yellow 14” is a fixture at any gathering of modelers.  Admittedly it is often a difficult exercise to applaud any man who voluntarily fought under the banner of Nazi Germany, but some warriors left an indelible mark on history for their exploits, bravery, chivalry, and skill.  Marseilles is inarguably one of those men.


Trumpeter’s kit of the same is an impressive mix of modern tooling and detail to build into a very impressive model.  Insofar as part layout and complexity it falls between most of Tamiya’s large scale offerings and Hasegawa’s.  That is just enough more complexity and detail to make it catch your eye, but not enough to require a dozen steps to build the cockpit or engine.  The majority of the kit fits together as well as anything you would find from either of the big two.  That said, the finicky fit of the engine makes this kit impossible to recommend to anyone unless you want a kit with a basic DB 601 engine displayed.


The problems all seem to stem from the construction of the engine itself. Specifically the attachment of the individual exhaust manifolds. While it builds to be a convincing replica of an important historical engine, there are problems. The exhaust are the one place in this whole model that should require a tight positive fit to assure proper orientation but the exhaust themselves have several degrees of play in their vertical orientation. As they have to protrude out through slits in the fuselage halves, this is a critical alignment.  As I found out, a slight and even imperceptible, misalignment of the exhausts can cause the flimsy fuselage nose to warp out of true making alignment of the prop hub, or the cowlings positioned in the closed position, almost impossible without significant modification. If you are planning on building this kit, I strongly suggest ignoring the instructions and finding a way to attach the exhausts after the fuselage is together, even if you want to leave the cowls open.

Another problem is that for all of the effort Trumpeter put into providing a nicely detailed engine, and cowlings with nice internal detail, they also decided to have multiple and prominent injector pin marks on the interior of each cowl.  These are difficult to remove without destroying. With some careful sanding and filling an acceptable result can be achieved.

IMG_0351Beyond that, construction was relatively simple and straight forward. It took me about as long to get the cockpit and engine built up as it did to finish the rest of the model.  Modelers should be aware that if you want to pose the lower cowl open, the drop tank cannot be installed.  This is not mentioned in the instructions and I didn’t find out until too late into the build. Further, beyond a few placard decals for the cockpit and engine, I would highly recommend aftermarket wheels and the Quickboost tropical filter.  The difference between the kit and Aires wheels is breathtaking.  The fit is flawless with no modification (a rarity with anything Aires, and aftermarket wheels in general) and it allowed me to wait until the end to install the tail wheel. The kit tropical filter is unnecessarily complicated with too chunky and out-of-scale mounts.  Both are worth the money and effort to upgrade.

One mistake I made that I can’t really blame on the kit was that I went against my usual process to install the wing-tip navigation lights.  I had presumed, given the relatively minor fit issues with the rest of the kit (engine notwithstanding it is a great kit), that the wing tip lights would simply drop in with a little glue after paint.  This is wrong assumption on almost every kit, and especially wrong on this kit.  Not only do the sprue mounting points on the lens require buffing of the part itself (and resultant minor changing of the shape of the lens), but the notches on the wing tips for the lights don’t particularly fit well without some help, and or filler.  The better method would have been to install the lights before paint, and sand/fill to fit, then mask as is per my usual. Instead I was left trying to cobble together an acceptable fix with bondic that left the port light a bit misshapen in appearance.

Overall my recommendation for the modeler who simply wants a representation of Marseille’s “Yellow 14” for their collection would be to find the Hasegawa kit (note: I haven’t built that kit specifically but have built enough Hasegawa kits of similar vintage to extrapolate).  On the other hand if you want a bit more detail than Hasegawa out of the box, and a more challenging build with a displayed engine, this kit won’t let you down.






You say you want to build a 1/48 Marauder? You’ve been warned.


In the early summer I was contacted about building a Martin B-26 Marauder as “Flak Bait” for a family friend who wanted it as a Christmas gift for a family friend of his (this family friend had actually flown on Flak Bait in December 1943).  After discussing some general parameters, such as scale, detail level, time investment and cost, we were set.

I found the options in 1/48 were a Monogram kit from 1978 and an Escii kit.  Having relatively recently built the re boxed Monogram 1/48 B-25 from the same vintage, I thought I knew what to expect. But, a Google search revealed there were only a half dozen or so build reviews, mostly from the early 2000s, and this lack of return was unusual if not concerning.  I ordered the Hasegawa boxing of the same. Thus began an odyssey that would last six months.

I began, as per usual, by reading through the few builds I could find of the Marauder online, and found that most builders, as per usual, complained of some considerable trouble with some part of the build. The gripes seem to cluster around the tail to fuselage joint and the issues with the clear parts in that area; the engine nacelle to wing joint; the lack of guidance or space to effectively fit enough weight forward of the gear to make it sit on its nose; the fit of the multi part cowlings, and; late 1970s soft detail (generally correct shape, raised panel lines, some detail inside but nothing spectacular).

For the first time in memory, and surprisingly, all reviews were correct. Not only correct, but they seemed to actually be too kind to the overall build process of this kit.  I’m used to taking the typical modern review and discounting most of it as incessant whining about how [insert kit here] isn’t on par with one of Tamiya’s recent master works that fall together leaving the modeler as little more than a painter of a three dimensional object. No, this kit would test almost every skill that I had.  The oddest thing about this relic is that a beginner with little experience and time could end with something that reasonably resembles a Marauder that would look to the uninitiated as being similar to the product that they would get out of a Tamiya Mustang/Spitfire/BF-109 in the same scale.  Conversely, to build this kit into something that an experienced modeler would get out of a similar Tamiya kit, takes an intense investment in time, effort, money, patience, and tears. I’m not sure I succeeded, either.

I could spend paragraphs griping about all of the issues I had, but I will just try to boil it down. Here are the main issues, and how I believe the intrepid modeler can deal with each.

  1. Cowlings. Throw the kit parts away and look for the Loon Models corrected version. You’ll still have some sanding to do and careful fitting to get it to join the nacelles properly, but you won’t have to deal with trying to maintain the shape of the cowling after filling the huge gaps left by Monogram. Note the fantastic Quickboost engine above the Loon cowling.

2. The nacelle to wing joint.  Good luck.  You’re just going to need a great deal of patience to fill and sand this area.  As I had decided to scribe the whole model, I wasn’t worried about obliterating panel lines here.  I used my trusty quad grit sanding stick, sanding sponges, several layers of gap filling super glue followed by a couple layers of Bondo to assure a smooth transition.  Patience and time here will go a long way to assuring the model builds into something nice. Without a great deal of work, especially around the nacelle tips that in places had a gap of a 1/4″ or more, there is no way to build the model without considerable gaps and steps.

IMG_10243. Weight.  I bought three bags of fishing weights and installed one each in the front of each nacelle and behind the cockpit bulkhead in what would be the radio room. Luckily I ended up with a spare kit, and used the spare cockpit bulkhead as a rear face on the weights in case anyone could actually peer into the radio room through the two tiny windows. As I found in the completed build, you can’t see anything inside there, so don’t be too worried if you don’t have an extra kit. The good news is it sits on its gear perfectly (I would also suggest using SAC metal landing gear to help bear the increased load).

IMG_10534. Fit of clear parts. If you aren’t already comfortable sanding and polishing clear parts, you will be after this build.  Beyond the canopy, nose cone, and tail gunner’s glass, there are no fewer than 8 other windows that will need to be installed before you close up the fuselage. Most of these clear parts had sizable gaps around them requiring some gap filling super glue and lots of sanding and polishing to return them to clarity (be careful not to sand flat spots on the fuselage).  The canopy, nose cone, and tail gunner’s glass all needed the same treatment. In fact, when I was done with the canopy glass I had sanded and polished off all of the raised detail.  To get the windows in place on the canopy, I carefully created the canopy ribbing with Tamiya tape and used Eduard’s & Montex masks as guides. It took a great deal longer than I had expected and the results were adequate.

There were other more minor issues, to be sure.

-The kit decals were 13 years old and had been destroyed necessitating finding the aftermarket decals for Flak Bait.

-The wings are supposed to have a 1 degree anhedral but sag a bit if allowed to rest on the kit spars. I got as close as I could.

-The tail to fuselage joint is an odd step. Use your imagination here when trying to figure out a solution. I’m not sure that I did.

-The bomb bay doors were clearly not designed to be displayed in the closed position.  Spend the extra time to build out the bomb bay with the doors open. It will take less time than trying to fill the odd gaps left by the kit parts fitting into the openings molded into the fuselage.  Also, the crew apparently accessed the rear of the ship through the bomb bay so sitting with the doors open could be an accurate portrayal of a parked Marauder.

-The landing lights are laughable but provide a good base for some scratch building. Check your references and go to town.

This was a process that just took time, patience, ingenuity and some old fashioned luck.  Unless you are an absolute beginner and gaps and weird fit aren’t an issue, or you are a relatively skilled B-26 fanatic and must build a B-26 in 1/48 scale, I would suggest you steer clear of this kit.  Anything in between will end in tears and disappointment.

Speaking of tears and disappointment, the day after I delivered this kit to my customer, who was going to deliver it to the man who flew on Flak Bait in December 1943, I was told that the latter had been admitted to hospice with only days to live. The intended recipient might not ever get to see the model built in his honor. To Mr. Greer, and those quiet souls like him who risked and gave so much in their youth, I say godspeed and thank you for a life well lived.



EduArt’s P-40N: right in the “Goldilocks zone”.

Every modeler has their own way to rate the quality of a kit. To some, a low price point trumps all other considerations. To others, ease of build or out-of-box detail might be the defining factors. To me, I prefer a good mix of out of box detail without unnecessary over-engineering, and I want it to go together in a way that is more akin to building a plastic model than carving a model out of plastic. I’m willing to pay for those considerations, although there is definitely an upper limit to my generosity.

boxartEduard’s limited Edition boxing of Hasegawa’s P-40N pushed the envelope of my desire to pay for a kit.  But, as I have come to expect from Eduard’s “profipack” boxings of other kits, everything one needs for an exceptional build is in the box.  This is no exception.  Ease of build, engineering, and detail all sit right in the “Goldilocks Zone”. The end result is a truly enjoyable build without many head-scratching engineering choices, and extra detail (including some attractive marking options) that elevate the stock Hasegawa kit into rarefied air.

There isn’t much to say about this build that can’t be said about every other build: follow the instructions, and test fit often. There are only a few areas where any modeler might need to take more time.

I’m using tape here to minimize the wing root gap and assure the correct dihedral. Note the putty around the gun inserts on the wing leading edge and a ring of filler around the tail.
  1. The .50 cal barrels are molded into their own insert that fits into the leading edge of the wing.  The barrels are very nice (and hollowed out) but this joint will need some extra attention, as well as some putty, to seamlessly transition to the wing.
  2. As the P-40N had a longer fuselage, Hasegawa elected to use the same forward fuselage from other marks, and a new longer tail section for the N version.  In order to minimize the joint between the forward and aft fuselage sections, I elected to attach each tail half to its corresponding fuselage half first.  I did this to make sure there wasn’t a step in the fuselage and that the panel lines and riveting matched up.
  3. If you elect to use the canopy provided to be shown in the open position, it has no positive location points.  In other words, without carefully gluing the canopy to the fuselage, the sliding canopy will not stay put.  This took some super thin CA glue, a glue looper, and a bit of time to assure I didn’t fog any of the clear plastic.
  4. The navigation lights will just take patience, and time.  The kit instructions ask the modeler to remove the lights molded into the wing tips and vertical tail, to then replace them with a photo-etch ring, and then install clear lights.  This was probably more effort than it was worth. If I had to build this model again, I would simply paint the molded on kit lights with Model Master chrome, and then cover that with translucent Tamiya red and green.

Beyond that, there are many areas where this kit shines. The general fit was exceptional. Even the fuselage to wing root gap was minimal, although it did require some corrective dihedral.  The provided photo-etch for the cockpit really amps up the detail and realism.  The clear parts included in the kit are wonderfully clear and required no Future or polishing to get a great result. The windscreen to fuselage engineering is masterful and Eduard’s pre cut masks fit perfectly. The landing gear were incredibly easy to install and provide one of the more solid gear attachment points I’ve ever encountered. Eduard’s resin exhaust and wheels are truly works of art. I could go on, but I won’t.

The bottom line is if you want a late war P-40 in 1/32 to add to your collection, this is a must-have. The stock kit is suitable for all but the most green of builders.  Anyone with a pocket full of cash, and a little experience using resin and photo-etch, will find this kit enjoyable and the end result suitable for display.



Special Hobby’s Tempting 1/32 Tempest MK V.

There are really only two books that have inspired me to model specific subjects. The one that matters to this discussion is Pierre Clostermann’s diary “The Big Show.” In it is an unvarnished account of the author’s time as a Free French pilot in the RAF in command of both the legendary Spitfire and the brooding Tempest Mk V. To me the Tempest with its gaping maw, cuts a profile of a bare knuckle boxer, a hard-as-coffin-nails street fighter. The Tempest exudes a singular purpose of power in a way the more elegant Spitfires, Mustangs and Lightings do not. And, having recently made the transition from 1/48 to 1/32 I had to build not only a Tempest, but one of Clostermann’s.

Clostermann in his Tempest Mk. V, NV 994.
I really enjoyed the detail and build of the cockpit, especially with the addition of HGW’s fabric belts.

Enter the Special Hobby 1/32 high tech Tempest Mk. V. I read several in box reviews and was amazed at the level of detail that Special Hobby had appeared to achieve. I ordered one and dove in with excitement and high expectations. I must admit that my initial expectations of the kit were too high, and that is not the fault of Special Hobby but of Tamiya. I had just completed Tamiya’s 1/32 Corsair and that unfairly set a bar that few kits could achieve. But, Special Hobby is not let off of the hook. While the detail is truly tantalizing, especially the cockpit, the fit and assembly is often immensely frustrating.

With a few tweaks, Special Hobby could have an exceptional kit on their hands. What Special Hobby currently has is inarguably one of the two best Tempest Mk V in 1/32 scale (note: there are only two Tempest V kits available in 1/32 scale). Make no mistake, if you are willing to invest the work, Special Hobby’s Tempest will build into an impressive and substantial display piece, but it will provide many hours of frustration and unnecessary work to get there.

I will not recount every step of my build that spanned over ten weeks, or each of the many areas that I believe needed improvement. Some of those issues could be problems I created. I will, however, address a few areas that provided me the most trouble.

  1. Wheel Bays: This is the place that needs a redesign from Special Hobby. The instructions provided in my kit were incorrect (they were correct in my version of their Mk II). The construction is unnecessarily complicated and finicky. Slight misalignments in this stage can throw off the alignment of the top wing, thus throwing off everything from the fit of wing tip lights, to the inserts Special Hobby created for the inner wing to allow the same wing moldings for the Mk. V and Mk. II. Later in the construction, Special Hobby wants the builder to install about a dozen small parts, all of which required varying degrees of modification to fit correctly. Most troubling were the fit of the knuckle where the main landing gear struts connect to the wheel bays. I had to modify them until they were almost unrecognizable. It all worked in the end, but I think that was more my will than the kit. Special Hobby should look at creating a one piece resin wheel bay insert. This would fix the correct proportions and alignment of all of the important parts.
  2. Cowling: The focal point of the Tempest V is the prominent yawning radiator/oil cooler inlet. Special Hobby created a sub assembly with the radiator faces sandwiched between two halves of the engine and radiator cowlings. After dry fitting and trying to correct the fit of this multiple part affair,
    Note filler required for a smooth transition between cowling and fuselage and inner wing inserts and wing.

    I decided the best way to assemble these parts is to ignore the steps suggested in the instructions. I glued the cowling halves together so as to be able to fill and sand the prominent seams on the inner and outer surfaces of the radiator scoop. Then, I had to sand down the radiator faces to fit into the assembled cowling. The next step is to fit the assembled cowling onto the assembled fuselage. Every build I’ve seen of this kit has had some sort of significant step/gap between the engine cowling sub assembly and the fuselage, so I am not alone. The fit of the cowling halves required substantial sanding and filling that required a great deal of riveting and scribing to resurrect from plastic sanded smooth.

  3. Other: The instructions, while pretty, often provide less than necessary clarity on how to assemble the parts, or are outright wrong (as was the case with the wheel bays). The clear parts all required some modification to fit correctly (especially the landing, navigation, and formation lights). The fit was bad enough that, when possible, I attached the lights with gap filling CA, then sanded/polished to match the surrounding contours. This means you need to put the lights on before paint so as not to destroy the paint during sanding. The gun sight is provided in a beautifully cast resin that is almost impossible to fit into the windscreen correctly. Pay great attention here, with lots of dry fitting.

Ultimately the rule on this kit is simple: dry fit constantly, plan ahead, and give yourself plenty of time to build it. This kit can’t be rushed. The Tempest requires the builder’s full attention (ironically, I think this was said by her pilots, too). With time, patience and intermediate skill, a great result awaits. As a good friend who has built the kit said, “this is the best-worst kit you’ll ever build.” In sum, it’s modern Tamiya level detail with 1960’s era Revellogram fit.


Here is an album of un-narrated pictures during the build process.

Here is an album of the completed model.

Luftwaffe Double Build – Update…final.

The themed double build that turned into a slightly off theme triple build ended with a spectacular…fizzle.

To recap, the build started with Eduard’s FW 190A-5 and Italeri’s JU 87B-2 Stuka.  The 190 was completed with some hair-pulling due to decal silvering.  Similarly frustrating, some parts issues with the Stuka put it on pause, so I started and completed a Hobby Boss Mig 3.  And then, things fell quiet for a few weeks while I waited on replacement canopy parts to arrive from Italy.

And then, more waiting.

In fact, I waited so long that I decided to just try to repair the short-shot pilot’s canopy (having already fixed the destroyed-on-sprue bomb trapeze). And, I did. It took about a week of piddling around with superglue, abrasives and bondo, but I finally got it to a place where I felt I could mask and paint the part. That I did, and like Pontious Pilote, I washed my hands of the whole ordeal.  I wasn’t terribly happy with Italeri’s customer service, but I wasn’t terribly upset at the kit. In fact, I think it turned out well despite of the effort it took to get some of the kit parts to usable form.

And then after all of that effort…the canopy parts finally arrived to great pomp and circumstance. Frankly, I might use the replacement canopy, but don’t hold me to it.

So, without further ado here are the completed builds (Stuka; 190; Mig 3).




Luftwaffe Double Build – Update 6

  1. move forward or make progress, especially when circumstances make this slow or difficult.

Finally progress on the Stuka.

In fact, I’ve made some pretty significant movement towards the goal of finishing this beast up.  In the time it has taken me to get this far on the Stuka, I have finished Trumpeter’s Mig-3, and Eduard’s FW 190A-5.  As I have mentioned ad nauseum, part of the foot-dragging on the Stuka build has been wading through some broken part issues.  Figuring those out has taken some of the wind from the proverbial sails.

As she stands right now, all of the parts issues have been addressed (no telling how long it will take me to get a replacement canopy from Italeri), and the model is almost ready for the gloss clear.  I am actually very happy with the way things are coming along with the paint.

The paint, minus the primer, are all from Vallejo’s model air Luftwaffe set (RLM 02, RLM 04, RLM 65, RLM 70, RLM 71).  I still think I prefer Model Master enamels, but these were not bad to shoot, dry quickly, and are easy to clean up. The downside is that they don’t seem to be as durable. I’ve read horror stories of Vallejo paints peeling under masks, but that isn’t a problem I have faced.

I’ve grown to prefer the so-called black basing method over pre-shading, but it takes significantly longer.  Using this method I literally paint each panel individually. This technique gives some nice subtle variation between the panesls that I find comparable to models that I’ve seen using pre and post shading methods.

For both accuracy and speed, I used LF Models pre cut vinyl masks for the camoflage. I’ve used these on several builds and really like them. Admittedly they are less helpful with the straight lines of Luftwaffe splinter camouflage than RAF schemes found on the Spitfire, Tempest, or Mossie.  Total paint time is somewhere in the 4 hour range, not including drying time between colors or masking.

I think I am on schedule to finish this kit this weekend (replacement canopy notwithstanding).  That’s a good thing as my wife is about to pop. For her sake, I hope it happens soon. She looks very uncomfortable.

Once baby day arrives I will take a couple of weeks away from the bench to get situated with a new child, but then I have a couple of builds in que for the fall.  I committed myself to the Multi-Engine (bomber) Group Build on Facebook’s Military Model Graveyard. For that I have Monogram’s 1/48  Heinkel HE 111 – H4/6 lined up, with Eduard’s PE, and other goodies. I have to submit my build in early January.  I’ve also committed myself to a Reddit s/modelmakers Strike Fighters groupbuild.  For that, I’m doing Revell’s F-15E Strike Eagle with enough ordinance to single handedly win a war. It has a tentative start date of November 1st through February 1st.  Join me there!

Luftwaffe Double Build – Update 5

With the 190 finished, and the Mig-3 added, this should probably be called the “Great Patriotic War” double build instead.

My original plan was to do the Stuka in a scheme flown from France in mid 1940, but I am considering changing that to one from flom Russia in July of 1941.  At least that way my pedantic mind can tolerate the thematic shift in the titular double build.  Yes, that sentence is truly as awful as it seems, and no I am not changing it.

On to the updates.


Having lost a weekend to a haze of BBQ, booze, friends and football (and being officially part of the largest football game-ever- [per Guinness]), I haven’t made huge step20160914_144339s on the Stuka. What I have done is to fix the bomb trapeze as best as I could with styrene rod. I’ve also painted the interior color of the canopy frames.  This revealed that I still have a little bit of work to do on some of the seams where the engine cowling meets the fuselage.  I also decided to attach all of the antenna, flap actuators, and counter-weights.  I would normally wait until the build is almost done for this step, but Italeri had a conspicuous lack of positive location for these parts.  I wanted to make sure I had a good glue bond. Attaching them pre-paint is the only way to guarantee that bond will be sufficient, and to easily clean up any mistakes with the glue. The down side is that now I have lots of easy to knock-off bits that I will have to work around during painting.  Fingers crossed.



I have made some progress here. The aircraft has been primed with the blue underside painted. The remaining parts for the Mig are in different states of prep, but most all have been primed and or painted.

Painting a two tone spinner is always a challenge. This time I masked the line between the20160914_143933 red and white with a thin strip of bare metal foil.  Getting the foil to adhere to a compound curve is much easier than any other sort of tape I have tried. And, the line is nice and sharp (for the most part). While I wait for the blue underbelly to cure, I am going to finish up the landing gear and wheels. Then, I will make some masks for the upper-white v. lower-blue demarcation line. To date I have been very impressed with Vallejo model air white paint, but I have never used it on this much of a model.  Let’s see how it works.




Luftwaffe Double Build – Update 4

This has been a rather forgettable few days for me in the hobby.  Several more precious hours vanished with not much to show.  Well, I do have something to show but it’s just transactions out of my bank account and into the pockets of various ebay merchants and

The Stuka

Italeri, I’m giving you the stank eye.

This is the second kit in a row that has come with malformed and broken parts.  For those of you with statistics backgrounds, I believe that means 100% of the Italeri kits that I own have parts issues.  The first is Italeri’s 1/72nd C-130 that I am building for a friend. One of the fuselage halves was cracked almost all of the way through.  The Stuka has

Notice the step along the bottom of the canopy in the foreground?

a short shot canopy, and a broken bomb trapeze.  The C-130 issue is in the process of being resolved, but Italeri couldn’t ship the part to me directly.  I had to go through a U.S. distributer and was told that it would take roughly 12 weeks for the parts to arrive.  That was about 6 weeks ago.  This time Italeri would deal with me directly, but that’s probably because they just told me that they didn’t have the bomb trapeze (Sprue B) but would be happy to sell me the clear sprue. I ordered a vacu-formed canopy, but it is for the Airfix Stuka. I will probably bite the bullet and simply order the correct parts from Italeri. At this point, why not?

The top right portion was broken in the bag, and the broken part was missing.

On a positive note, the delivery bearing the canopy masks I ordered  from the Czech Republic arrived.  Apparently they were rerouted to orbit Saturn before they found their way to my doorstep.  At this point, the Stuka is mostly masked and almost ready for priming.  I simply have to find a way to make the broken trapeze regenerate it’s missing section.  We will see how that works out.

To be clear, these part problems aren’t fatal to the build singularly, they are just disappointing. I had wanted to do an out of the box build for a local competition and scratch building parts would disqualify the build. Taken as a whole, it is apparent that Italeri’s quality control is flawed, as is their customer service.  There are better kits on the market at these price points, with both better quality and more responsive service. As such, Italeri just isn’t competitive in my eyes and these will be the last Italeri kits I build if other options are available.


Mig-3 Early

Trumpeter, you get the stank eye too.

This is truly a pretty nice kit. The problem is that I dropped and lost the clear landing light cover that goes in the wing after I scratched a little landing light detail. I tried to contact Trumpeter directly, but my Chinese is rusty and so are Trumpeter’s web design skills.  After some Googling I found a U.S. distributer of Trumpeter kits. I contacted them and asked if I could purchase a replacement clear sprue.  They kindly declined stating that unless I could prove I purchased the kit from them indirectly, they wouldn’t help me. I bought the kit through an unnamed auction site, so I have neither a receipt or proof that I bought it from a retailer that purchased it from them. Ugh.

I bought another kit for donor parts. Yes, I probably could have made the landing light from acrylic or otherwise, but that could create a bigger time issue than simply ordering the parts. Time I don’t have, a little pocket change for an extra kit, I do.


The next burp is completely my fault.  I bought Eduard’s beautiful landing flap detail set, and it arrived.  I dove in to the metal oragami only to find that as I had not modified portions of the wing prior to this point in construction that the flaps just didn’t fit.  I cut, trimmed, modified and filed the parts until I had nothing discernable left.  This is certainly par for the course, as I’ve recently developed a pretty terrible case of the modeling shanks.The end result is that I simply glued the kit flaps in the up position, spread around a little Perfect Plastic Putty, and called it a day.

I actually really like this kit, and would build it again (good thing as I will have a duplicate kit to build).  As it stands now, once I get the donor kit, drop in the landing light lens, I can begin priming.


It looks like the next update will have both the Stuka and the Mig in the paint booth getting a good coat of primer. In the meantime, I am off for a weekend out of town with old friends, and some football.

Luftwaffe Double Build – Update 3

One down, one to go.

I put the finishing touches on the FW 190A-5.


I am pleased with the end result, but exceedingly frustrated with the decal situation.  As I still haven’t firmly diagnosed the problem, and I replaced my Microsol and Microset with new bottles, I’m still going to blame Eduard’s decals. I refuse to believe I was at fault, because I am a man.

Regardless the Butcher Bird fills a hole in the miniature airforce and looks nice next to Eduard’s new tool Bf 109G-6. And, they both look great juxtaposed against the allies premier fighters from the European theater such as the Tempest, Spitfire and Mustang.

The Stuka is moving slow as molasses. Italeri confounds me. The fit is surprisingly good, as is the detail. But, the parts need more cleaning up than I would’ve expected and some are broken.  Not only is the bomb trapeze broken on the sprue and unusable, but I just discovered that the pilot’s sliding canopy is malformed.  I believe it would be called a “short shot” when the plastic didn’t fill the mold as appears to be the case. That means I am going to have to wait on replacement parts to be shipped from Italy.  Who knows how long that will take.  Italeri is batting 1000 with broken and malformed parts. Granted, I only have two of their kits, but the 1/72 C-130 that I will be building for a friend had the fuselage cracked in half upon delivery.

Anyway, since t20160901_235228he last update nothing much has happened. The gaps have been puttied and sanded, panel lines have been re-scribed,  the horizontal tail has been installed with some other miscellaneous bits, and the next big step is masking and priming.   It’s a lot of hurrying up to wait.

As time still slips away towards the baby-hiatus, and with the FW finished, I decided to fill the opening in my schedule with a quick build. I threw around some ideas, including building Hobby Boss’s ME 262, but I ultimately broke into Trumpeter’s 1/48 Mig-3. Something about the winter camo seemed like it would be an interesting addition to the collection, and a departure from the Luftwaffe’s famous three tone mottle and splinter camoflage.

This has been a fantastic experience to date. The parts fit together well. Detail is good minus the rather stark instrument panel in the cockpit.  Eduard’s zoom photo-etch fixed that issue with great results.  It took a day to paint and assemble the cockpit, and another day to assemble the wings and the fuselage. I drilled out the wing root intakes and added some brash mesh for interest, other than that and Eduard’s zoom PE this has been a simple assembly.  Color me very impressed with this Trumpeter kit. If it is an indication of things to come with the 1/32 P-38 I have in the stash, it will be a joy. Good thing, because there are about a million parts to assemble in that kit.

 EDIT: As the Stuka is progressing so slowly, and the Mig 3 so quickly, I’m thinking of doing a “Great Patriotic War” double build. If I do, Ill be adding Accurate Miniatures Yak 1-b. I’ll built it straight from the box, with Montex masks. 


Luftwaffe Double Build – Update 2

Eduard’s FW 190A-5 is approaching the finish line, and Italeri’s JU 87B-2 is taking baby steps.

The Stuka.

As a general rule, before I sand and fill seams on a model I like to get as many of the clear parts on as possible.  Specifically, I like to get windscreens masked and installed.  The benefit of this is manifold to me, but specifically this allows me to blend in any seams where the clear parts meet the aircraft while I am working the usual fuselage and wing seams.  And, as an added benefit, the masked and attached windscreens and canopies tend to protect the delicate cockpits from dust intrusion or from having pieces knocked off while the model is handled with less care during the sanding and filling part of a build.

I say all of that to explain the stasis of the Stuka.  I’m still waiting on my masks to arrive from somewhere near the former Iron Curtain (note: it took the crew of Apollo 11 less time to travel to the moon, work, travel back to earth, be quarantined, and then participate in a ticker tape parade, than it does to get mail from many parts of the civilized world).  I can make my own masks, you say?  Poppycock! Horsefeathers!  I could walk to work (uphill both ways, mind you) but that would just feel like regression as a species.

I did receive the replacement exhausts, and after priming them black, I laid down a thin 20160829_170551coat of Alclad aluminum, then a dry brush with Model Master rust.  This is usually my go to method for exhaust stacks, varying the amount of aluminum or rust over the black primer as a way to get different effects.

After the exhaust were installed, it was time to put the cowling on the Stuka (Pro-tip: the following will take all three of your hands). After some dry fitting (pro-tip2: put the cowling around the engine before you mount the whole engine/mount/cowling assembly to the firewall – also known as ”follow the directions.”), I decided the thing to do was to line up the three piece cowling assembly, tape it together, and use Tamiya Extra Thin cement to fuse that unit  as a whole, but leave it floating around the engine but not attached to the fuselage. Once it was reasonably dry, the wrestling match began.  Using some force I could align the cowling with the fuselage with minimal gaps to the firewall and fuselage.  My standard go-to, Tamiya Extra Thin wouldn’t bond this joint quickly enough so I had to break out the big guns:  I unsheathed the glue-looper and thin CA glue and prepared for battle.  Good luck figuring out how to hold the model, apply pressure to the cowling, and use a glue looper simultaneously.  I would tell you how I did it, but I don’t want to ruin the fun.

In sum, I think I won the wrestling match.  While the fit and engineering isn’t as good as a Tamiya, Hasegawa, or recent Eduard, it’s nothing to be scared of.  Not yet, at least.


The Butcher Bird.

So close.  All that is left is the prop and some minor chipping with a Prisma Color pencil.  After some troubles early on, and much grumbling by yours truly, Eduard’s kit has been redeemed somewhat in my eyes.  Aside from a minor issue with the decals, again, I don’t have much to say negative about this kit.  The decal issue is perplexing. For the second kit in a row, Eduard’s decals have silvered on me somewhat. I was extra cautious this time, given my disappointment with the 109’s stencils, and still had a similar issue. This time, the stencil decals weren’t manufactured by Eduard, but were made in Italy (which likely means Cartograf). Either I’ve gotten into a bad habit that is causing this, one that I haven’t diagnosed yet, or Eduard’s decals are problematic (they are a bit old), or my MicroSet and MicroSol have gone bad.  I don’t know, but I ordered new bottles of the latter just to be sure. The next update will hopefully be pictures of the finished model.






Luftwaffe Double Build – Update 1

Progress on both the Stuka and FW 190 has been steady though not rapid.  And, most of the progress has been on building sub-assemblies that will not be seen in any meaningful way.

Eduard’s FW-190 has a rather complicated little engine. Each of the parts needed attention as there was a surprising amount of flash.  After spending an evening carefully cleaning the parts, painting, assembling, and weathering, I installed the engine into the kit fuselage.  All of that hard work was rewarded by the realization that none of it will ever be seen again. And by none, I mean it.  It isn’t even like a huge double-wasp on a P-47 where taking time to detail the front of the engine with ignition leads will pay off with a satisfying level of realism.  The 190 has a fan that sits behind the prop hub, and between that and the gear box, all of the pretty engine detail sits significantly behind the cowling and is all but obscured.

I might need to walk back some of my criticisms of Eduard’s 190 a bit, as well.  It seems after arguing with the kit for a couple of weeks, it took a little more than a few swipes with some perfect plastic putty and the seams were filled.  A light sanding with a 1000 grit sanding sponge and she is mostly ready to prime and paint.

The cowling on the specific 190 I am building is black and white striped with yellow on the bottom.  Instead of priming the whole aircraft, masking and painting the cowling, then re-priming to cover the overspray, I decided to just paint and mask the cowl first.  After that is dry, 20160826_095017I will mask the cowling and prime the whole model.  I can probably have it painted this weekend.

Italeri’s Stuka had a much less complicated engine. But Like the 190, once the cowl is closed, much of it will be invisible.  How much? I’m not exactly sure, but there are some large openings for vents and the radiator that will allow some portion of the engine to be seen.  As I didn’t know how much, I figured it was best to paint and weather the whole thing just in case. And, there wasn’t a significant time penalty involved in doing it all, compared to doing just parts of it.  Italeri even included little rubber hoses which I think are a nice touch.  Displaying the engine compartment open would require much more detail to the engine and fire wall, something I wont be doing anyway, but the hoses are neat nonetheless.


Before I can close up the engine cowling on the Stuka, I have to put the exhaust on the engine. I began to prep the exhausts for painting, but broke them while trying to drill out the openings. Ugh.  The solution is just to order some resin replacement parts, and the good news is that I won’t have to drill any of them out. Speaking of that, the Stuka’s bomb trapeze was broken on the sprue and the part that had broken off was missing.  The only option I have is to try to make my own, or order a replacement part from Italeri.  No telling how long either will take.  I can’t really move ahead with the build until I get the canopy masks and exhaust anyway, so the Stuka will be slowing down a bit.  This doesn’t upset me, as the 190 is at my favorite point in the build – paint.



Luftwaffe double build

As time ticks down until the due date of my second child in early October, I feel a desperate need to get in as much building as possible.  I doubt I will have much bench time after  “she-the sequal” arrives, at least until we get things smoothed out.  Speaking of, Sun Tzu aptly states that you should only engage in combat if you have the advantage.  For the foreseeable future, it will be me and two dogs versus three women. This distribution of mamallian force *might* have given me the advantage 5,000 years ago, but my modern pawed calvary consists of two neutured animals (maybe three, depending on who you ask). To be fair, my side would win decisively if finding someplace quiet to take a nap, being grumpy, or looking for a snack was the key to victory.


Seeing that I really want to get some builds completed before my Family Medical Leave absence from the hobby, and seeing that I have recently transititoned from the Allies to the Axis powers when I built Eduard’s stellar new tool BF 109G6, I decided to stick with this theme to balance out my stable of allied airpower.  My goal is to add the major Luftwaffe aircraft to the world war 2 collection, and after a 109 the 190 was an obvious choice.  The real question was what to build as the third.  After batting around a JU 87,  HE 111, BF 110, or even an ME 262, I settled on the Stuka.   With a BF 109, an FW 190, and a JU 87 I will have the staples of the Luftwaffe represented. Once I get the latter two completed, I feel like I can be satisfied with a few months of poop diapers and spit up rags.

I dug into the stash and pulled out Eduard’s 1/48 FW 190A-5 and Italeri’s 1/48 JU 87 B-2.  The 190 is a striking aircraft with smooth lines and a fierce reputation. I decided to dig into that first.  Perhaps it is the comparison to Eduard’s 2016 achievement exhibited by the 109G-6, but the step down in quality was shocking.  As a general rule, I love Eduard, even their earlier kits (the X-1 and the Tempest stand out as a solid finished product that I am proud to display, but a build that left much to be desired in a world populated by shake and bake). If given the choice between anything and a Eduard Profipack, I’ll choose Eduard most every time.  But, going from one of the finest examples of plastic I’ve ever built, to one that the internet has given the dreaded label of “fiddly” ,”tricky”, or even “difficult” was  jarring.

Between travelling and a lack of motivation it has taken me a couple of weeks to just get the 190’s wings together, and the cockpit primed. Compare that to the Stuka.  I started on it yesterday and already have the cockpit in the fuselage, and the wings mounted to the cockpit. The Stuka will take some minor sanding and clean up, but it’s well out in front of the 190.  20160820_212917
Italeri also decided to include some impressive little photo etch parts in this kit.  If they would have just thrown some masks in the box, it would fall somewhere between the quality of Eduard’s Aerocobra and Hellcat profipacks- solid but not exceptional, better than many, but with room to improve. For the first time in a long time I am going to build a model without the crutch of Eduard’s pre-painted PE for the cockpit.  After I quit hyperventilating, I actually think I’m okay without Eduard PE.

One thing that really stands out is the size of these two aircraft.  The 190 is larger than a Mustang or BF-109, but smaller than a Thunderbolt or Hellcat.  The Stuka is, well…bigger than I imagined.  Check out the difference in wing area.  I pulled a 1/48 Dauntless out of the stash and compared the wings of that aircraft, a more apples to apples comparison, and found the Stuka was still about 1/5th bigger.


If I can get more time tomorrow, I plan on returning to the 190.  I think with another day like today, I could get it caught up to the Stuka.

EDIT: I was right. Another six hours at the bench today, and the FW 190A-5 is caught up with the Stuka (nose is taped on for a test fit).